vs
One table to see how seedream-4.0 (ByteDance) and qwen-image-edit (Qwen) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- qwen-image-edit has the lower output price, 14% cheaper than seedream-4.0.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | seedream-4.0 | qwen-image-edit |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Qwen |
| Type | Image | Image |
| Output price | ¥0.1904 | ¥0.1628 |
| Capabilities | 图片 | 图片 |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
seedream-4.0
新一代统一架构，集成生成与编辑；支持知识型生成与参考图一致性，最高 4K。
qwen-image-edit
千问系列首个图像编辑模型，成功将Qwen-Image的文本渲染能力拓展到编辑任务上。支持精准的中英双语文字编辑、视觉外观与语义双重编辑、具备强大的跨基准性能表现。
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, seedream-4.0 or qwen-image-edit?
- qwen-image-edit has the lower output price, 14% cheaper than seedream-4.0.
- Can I call seedream-4.0 and qwen-image-edit through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.