vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash (DeepSeek) and kimi-k2-thinking (Moonshot AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 88% cheaper than kimi-k2-thinking.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower output price, 88% cheaper than kimi-k2-thinking.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flashkimi-k2-thinking
ProviderDeepSeekMoonshot AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.4187¥3.4119
Output price¥1.675¥14.2163
Cache read¥0.0084¥0.853
Cache write—¥0
Capabilities文本文本
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 是 DeepSeek 当前主力模型,官方 API 模型名为 deepseek-flash。支持 1M 上下文与最大 384K 输出,默认可切换思考/非思考模式,具备图像理解、工具调用、JSON Output,并兼容 OpenAI 与 Anthropic API。

kimi-k2-thinking

开源思考型模型,擅长长链推理与连续工具调用,可稳定执行数百步自主研究、编码与多轮智能体任务,适合复杂分析与 Agent 工作流。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash or kimi-k2-thinking?
deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 88% cheaper than kimi-k2-thinking.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash and kimi-k2-thinking through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.