vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash (DeepSeek) and kimi-k2.7-code (Moonshot AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 91% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower output price, 91% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flashkimi-k2.7-code
ProviderDeepSeekMoonshot AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.4194¥4.503
Output price¥1.6775¥18.7046
Cache read¥0.0084¥0.9006
Cache write—¥5.2964
Capabilities文本文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 是 DeepSeek 当前主力模型,官方 API 模型名为 deepseek-flash。支持 1M 上下文与最大 384K 输出,默认可切换思考/非思考模式,具备图像理解、工具调用、JSON Output,并兼容 OpenAI 与 Anthropic API。

kimi-k2.7-code

Kimi K2 系列编程模型,接受文字与图像输入,默认开启思维链,适合长流程 Agent 编程与多轮调试。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash or kimi-k2.7-code?
deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 91% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash and kimi-k2.7-code through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.