vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash (DeepSeek) and glm-5 (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 92% cheaper than glm-5.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower output price, 91% cheaper than glm-5.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flashglm-5
ProviderDeepSeekZ.AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.4187¥5.0041
Output price¥1.675¥18.3674
Cache read¥0.0084¥0.9781
Cache write—¥0
Capabilities文本文本
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 是 DeepSeek 当前主力模型,官方 API 模型名为 deepseek-flash。支持 1M 上下文与最大 384K 输出,默认可切换思考/非思考模式,具备图像理解、工具调用、JSON Output,并兼容 OpenAI 与 Anthropic API。

glm-5

有竞争力的通用中文模型。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash or glm-5?
deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 92% cheaper than glm-5.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash and glm-5 through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.