vs
One table to see how qwen3.8-flash (Qwen) and mimo-v2-pro (Xiaomi) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 92% cheaper than mimo-v2-pro.
- qwen3.8-flash has the lower output price, 92% cheaper than mimo-v2-pro.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | qwen3.8-flash | mimo-v2-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Xiaomi |
| Type | Text | Text |
| Input price | ¥0.9272 | ¥11.373 |
| Output price | ¥2.7817 | ¥34.119 |
| Cache read | ¥0.0927 | ¥2.2746 |
| Cache write | ¥1.159 | ¥0 |
| Capabilities | 文本 · 多模态 | 文本 |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
qwen3.8-flash
Qwen3.8 系列 Flash 档，多模态推理，面向编程与 Agent 工作流，支持文档、代码库与长视频理解。
mimo-v2-pro
面向智能体的旗舰模型，擅长复杂流程编排与工程级任务执行
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, qwen3.8-flash or mimo-v2-pro?
- qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 92% cheaper than mimo-v2-pro.
- Can I call qwen3.8-flash and mimo-v2-pro through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.