vs

One table to see how qwen3.8-flash (Qwen) and glm-5.3 (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 87% cheaper than glm-5.3.
  • qwen3.8-flash has the lower output price, 89% cheaper than glm-5.3.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensionqwen3.8-flashglm-5.3
ProviderQwenZ.AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.9286¥7.1573
Output price¥2.7859¥25.0504
Cache read¥0.0929¥1.7893
Cache write¥1.1608—
Capabilities文本 · 多模态—
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

qwen3.8-flash

Qwen3.8 系列 Flash 档,多模态推理,面向编程与 Agent 工作流,支持文档、代码库与长视频理解。

glm-5.3

旗舰定位,面向复杂软件工程与长程 Agent 任务,多轮工具调用与长链路执行稳定,适合代码库级重构与自动化研发。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, qwen3.8-flash or glm-5.3?
qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 87% cheaper than glm-5.3.
Can I call qwen3.8-flash and glm-5.3 through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.