vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash (DeepSeek) and kimi-k3 (Moonshot) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than kimi-k3.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower output price, 98% cheaper than kimi-k3.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flashkimi-k3
ProviderDeepSeekMoonshot
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.4194¥15.8346
Output price¥1.6775¥79.1728
Cache read¥0.0084¥1.5835
Capabilities文本文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 是 DeepSeek 当前主力模型,官方 API 模型名为 deepseek-flash。支持 1M 上下文与最大 384K 输出,默认可切换思考/非思考模式,具备图像理解、工具调用、JSON Output,并兼容 OpenAI 与 Anthropic API。

kimi-k3

多模态推理模型,面向复杂编程、知识工作与长程 Agent 流程。擅长在大型代码库里调用工具、调试,并读取图像、日志与测试反馈来修正结果。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash or kimi-k3?
deepseek-v4.1-flash has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than kimi-k3.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash and kimi-k3 through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.