vs

One table to see how minimax-m3.1-flash (MiniMax) and qwen3.8-flash (Qwen) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 76% cheaper than qwen3.8-flash.
  • qwen3.8-flash has the lower output price, 64% cheaper than minimax-m3.1-flash.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensionminimax-m3.1-flashqwen3.8-flash
ProviderMiniMaxQwen
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.095¥0.4
Output price¥3.8¥1.35
Cache read¥0.95¥0.05
Cache write—¥0.625
Capabilities文本文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

minimax-m3.1-flash

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 是 MiniMax 推出的原生多模态 Agent 模型,支持文本、图片和视频输入,输出文本,具备 100 万 token 上下文窗口。模型面向 Agent 推理、工具调用、编程和长上下文任务,支持交错思维链与可调思考深度。

qwen3.8-flash

Qwen3.8 系列 Flash 档,多模态推理,面向编程与 Agent 工作流,支持文档、代码库与长视频理解。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, minimax-m3.1-flash or qwen3.8-flash?
minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 76% cheaper than qwen3.8-flash.
Can I call minimax-m3.1-flash and qwen3.8-flash through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.