vs

One table to see how minimax-m3.1-flash (MiniMax) and glm-5.3-flash (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 85% cheaper than glm-5.3-flash.
  • glm-5.3-flash has the lower output price, 41% cheaper than minimax-m3.1-flash.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensionminimax-m3.1-flashglm-5.3-flash
ProviderMiniMaxZ.AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.095¥0.64
Output price¥3.8¥2.24
Cache read¥0.95¥0.184
Capabilities文本文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

minimax-m3.1-flash

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 是 MiniMax 推出的原生多模态 Agent 模型,支持文本、图片和视频输入,输出文本,具备 100 万 token 上下文窗口。模型面向 Agent 推理、工具调用、编程和长上下文任务,支持交错思维链与可调思考深度。

glm-5.3-flash

GLM-5.3 系列 Flash 档,原生多模态,面向高效编程与长链路 Agent,长上下文稳定,适合生产级应用。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, minimax-m3.1-flash or glm-5.3-flash?
minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 85% cheaper than glm-5.3-flash.
Can I call minimax-m3.1-flash and glm-5.3-flash through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.