vs
One table to see how minimax-m3.1-flash (MiniMax) and glm-5.2 (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than glm-5.2.
- minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower output price, 69% cheaper than glm-5.2.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | minimax-m3.1-flash | glm-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Z.AI |
| Type | Text | Text |
| Input price | ¥0.095 | ¥3.5468 |
| Output price | ¥3.8 | ¥12.4139 |
| Cache read | ¥0.95 | ¥0.6967 |
| Cache write | — | ¥0 |
| Capabilities | 文本 | 文本 |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
minimax-m3.1-flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 是 MiniMax 推出的原生多模态 Agent 模型，支持文本、图片和视频输入，输出文本，具备 100 万 token 上下文窗口。模型面向 Agent 推理、工具调用、编程和长上下文任务，支持交错思维链与可调思考深度。
glm-5.2
GLM 5.2 是大型推理模型，支持百万上下文，适合长程 Agent、代码库编程与多步自动化。
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, minimax-m3.1-flash or glm-5.2?
- minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than glm-5.2.
- Can I call minimax-m3.1-flash and glm-5.2 through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.