vs
One table to see how qwen-image-2.0 (Qwen) and qwen-image-3.0-pro (Qwen) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- qwen-image-2.0 has the lower output price, 20% cheaper than qwen-image-3.0-pro.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | qwen-image-2.0 | qwen-image-3.0-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Qwen |
| Type | Image | Image |
| Input price | — | ¥0.008 |
| Output price | ¥0.08 | ¥0.1 |
| Capabilities | Image | Image |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
qwen-image-2.0
Unifies generation and editing in one model; native 2K; professional typography and infographics.
qwen-image-3.0-pro
Content-rich: supports up to 4.5k token input and dense information layouts within images, generating complex layouts such as newspapers, storyboards, menus, and exam papers in a single pass. True to detail: renders small text down to 10px precisely, and faithfully reproduces micro-expressions, pores, hair strands, and other details for a texture close to real photography. Deep in knowledge: natively renders 12 languages and multiple fonts, simulates mainstream web, gaming, and livestream interfaces, and incorporates external knowledge. Qwen-Image-3.0-Pro is not just after "good-looking" but "good to use" — making image generation a truly practical productivity tool.
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, qwen-image-2.0 or qwen-image-3.0-pro?
- qwen-image-2.0 has the lower output price, 20% cheaper than qwen-image-3.0-pro.
- Can I call qwen-image-2.0 and qwen-image-3.0-pro through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.