vs
One table to see how qwen3.7-flash (Qwen) and glm-5.3-flash (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- qwen3.7-flash has the lower input price, 75% cheaper than glm-5.3-flash.
- qwen3.7-flash has the lower output price, 68% cheaper than glm-5.3-flash.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | qwen3.7-flash | glm-5.3-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Z.AI |
| Type | Text | Text |
| Input price | ¥0.2001 | ¥0.8004 |
| Output price | ¥0.8671 | ¥2.668 |
| Cache read | ¥0.04 | ¥0.1601 |
| Cache write | ¥0.2535 | — |
| Capabilities | 文本 · 多模态 | 文本 · 多模态 |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
qwen3.7-flash
Qwen3.7 系列轻量档视觉语言推理模型，擅长物体识别、空间理解与真实场景视觉感知。面向多模态 Agent、视觉 Coding、搜索与计算机操作。
glm-5.3-flash
GLM-5.3 系列 Flash 档，原生多模态，面向高效编程与长链路 Agent，长上下文稳定，适合生产级应用。
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, qwen3.7-flash or glm-5.3-flash?
- qwen3.7-flash has the lower input price, 75% cheaper than glm-5.3-flash.
- Can I call qwen3.7-flash and glm-5.3-flash through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.