vs

One table to see how qwen3.8-max (Qwen) and glm-5.3-flash (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • glm-5.3-flash has the lower input price, 94% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.
  • glm-5.3-flash has the lower output price, 93% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensionqwen3.8-maxglm-5.3-flash
ProviderQwenZ.AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥8.9732¥0.5528
Output price¥26.9196¥1.8425
Cache read¥0.7478¥0.1106
Cache write¥1.8722—
Capabilities文本 · 多模态文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

qwen3.8-max

Qwen3.8 系列旗舰推理模型,支持多模态输入,面向复杂推理、视觉理解、编程与 Agent 工作流。

glm-5.3-flash

GLM-5.3 系列 Flash 档,原生多模态,面向高效编程与长链路 Agent,长上下文稳定,适合生产级应用。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, qwen3.8-max or glm-5.3-flash?
glm-5.3-flash has the lower input price, 94% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.
Can I call qwen3.8-max and glm-5.3-flash through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.