vs
One table to see how qwen3.8-max (Qwen) and glm-4.7-flash (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.
Quick verdict
- glm-4.7-flash has the lower input price, 94% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.
- glm-4.7-flash has the lower output price, 91% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Dimension | qwen3.8-max | glm-4.7-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Z.AI |
| Type | Text | Text |
| Input price | ¥8.9598 | ¥0.5687 |
| Output price | ¥26.8795 | ¥2.4452 |
| Cache read | ¥0.7467 | ¥0.0569 |
| Cache write | ¥1.8694 | ¥0 |
| Capabilities | 文本 · 多模态 | 文本 |
| Endpoints | 1 | 1 |
Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.
qwen3.8-max
Qwen3.8 系列旗舰推理模型，支持多模态输入，面向复杂推理、视觉理解、编程与 Agent 工作流。
glm-4.7-flash
超快中文处理，极其便宜。
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, qwen3.8-max or glm-4.7-flash?
- glm-4.7-flash has the lower input price, 94% cheaper than qwen3.8-max.
- Can I call qwen3.8-max and glm-4.7-flash through the same API?
- Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.