vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 (DeepSeek) and kimi-k3 (Moonshot) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than kimi-k3.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower output price, 98% cheaper than kimi-k3.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017kimi-k3
ProviderDeepSeekMoonshot
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.42¥15.7637
Output price¥1.68¥78.8183
Cache read¥0.0084¥1.5764
CapabilitiesTextText · Multimodal
Endpoints22

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is DeepSeek's current mainstay model; its official API model name is deepseek-flash. It supports a 1M context and up to 384K output, with thinking and non-thinking modes switchable by default, features image understanding, tool use, and JSON Output, and is compatible with the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs.

kimi-k3

A multimodal reasoning model for complex coding, knowledge work, and long-running agent tasks. It works across large codebases, calls tools, and debugs, using images, logs, and test output to refine its output.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 or kimi-k3?
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower input price, 97% cheaper than kimi-k3.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 and kimi-k3 through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.