vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 (DeepSeek) and qwen3.8-flash (Qwen) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 24% cheaper than deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017.
  • qwen3.8-flash has the lower output price, 36% cheaper than deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017qwen3.8-flash
ProviderDeepSeekQwen
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.42¥0.32
Output price¥1.68¥1.08
Cache read¥0.0084¥0.04
Cache write—¥0.5
CapabilitiesTextText · Multimodal
Endpoints22

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is DeepSeek's current mainstay model; its official API model name is deepseek-flash. It supports a 1M context and up to 384K output, with thinking and non-thinking modes switchable by default, features image understanding, tool use, and JSON Output, and is compatible with the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs.

qwen3.8-flash

The Flash tier of the Qwen3.8 series: multimodal reasoning for coding and agent workflows, with understanding of documents, codebases and long videos.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 or qwen3.8-flash?
qwen3.8-flash has the lower input price, 24% cheaper than deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 and qwen3.8-flash through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.