vs

One table to see how minimax-m3.1-flash (MiniMax) and kimi-k2.7-code (Moonshot AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 98% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.
  • minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower output price, 80% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensionminimax-m3.1-flashkimi-k2.7-code
ProviderMiniMaxMoonshot AI
TypeTextText
Input price¥0.095¥4.4828
Output price¥3.8¥18.6208
Cache read¥0.95¥0.8966
Cache write—¥5.2727
Capabilities文本文本 · 多模态
Endpoints11

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

minimax-m3.1-flash

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 是 MiniMax 推出的原生多模态 Agent 模型,支持文本、图片和视频输入,输出文本,具备 100 万 token 上下文窗口。模型面向 Agent 推理、工具调用、编程和长上下文任务,支持交错思维链与可调思考深度。

kimi-k2.7-code

Kimi K2 系列编程模型,接受文字与图像输入,默认开启思维链,适合长流程 Agent 编程与多轮调试。

FAQ

Which is cheaper, minimax-m3.1-flash or kimi-k2.7-code?
minimax-m3.1-flash has the lower input price, 98% cheaper than kimi-k2.7-code.
Can I call minimax-m3.1-flash and kimi-k2.7-code through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.