vs

One table to see how deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 (DeepSeek) and glm-5.2 (Z.AI) differ. On EasyAPI both use the same endpoint and the same key; only the model name changes.

Quick verdict

  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower input price, 88% cheaper than glm-5.2.
  • deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower output price, 86% cheaper than glm-5.2.

Specs and pricing side by side

Dimensiondeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017glm-5.2
ProviderDeepSeekZ.AI
TypeTextText
Context window—1M
Input price¥0.42¥3.5468
Output price¥1.68¥12.4139
Cache read¥0.0084¥0.8867
Cache write—¥0
CapabilitiesTextText
Endpoints21

Platform prices per million tokens (image / video models use their own units); your invoice is authoritative.

deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is DeepSeek's current mainstay model; its official API model name is deepseek-flash. It supports a 1M context and up to 384K output, with thinking and non-thinking modes switchable by default, features image understanding, tool use, and JSON Output, and is compatible with the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs.

glm-5.2

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, suited for long-horizon agents, repo-level coding, and multi-step automation.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 or glm-5.2?
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 has the lower input price, 88% cheaper than glm-5.2.
Can I call deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 and glm-5.2 through the same API?
Yes. Both are served through EasyAPI's OpenAI-compatible API. Point base_url at EasyAPI and swap the model name; no separate vendor accounts needed.
What are the context windows of deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 and glm-5.2?
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017: —. glm-5.2: 1M.